Видео

For 28:49 it didn't seem like the variables listed were said to contribute to ethnic consciousness? It seemed as if it just stated such as "patterns of bilin..." then said AND the variations in ethnic consciousness. It didn't appear as if the previously listed stated variables were said to contribute to ethnic consciousness. Is there something I'm not seeing, so far inference questions seem to be the brick wall I'm running into :( I love the lessons though, they're incredibly informative and helpful.

How is D for the last question negation. To me it seems to be reversal and negation.

On 15:50 answer choice A says ".... are influential thinkers". How can we derive the sentence "central to this type of critique..." to imply "influential thinkers. That part didn't click on me, is there any way to simplify the statement? I see how the rest of the sentences connect to answer choice A but i's the "influential thinkers" portion that messed me up.

What if conditional statements don’t link. What do u do then?

I hate these questions. They have cause me so many breakdowns. I’ve watched and read everything and done so many practice questions and test and still don’t understand it. Does that mean I just can’t understand them ever? I’m losing hope.

I love how much you hate consultants

26:41 There is the term " beneficial native plant" that made me hesitate to pick C. We have beneficial fungi, but no " beneficial native plants." I picked D as a result of this term switch. Of course "all types" is too strong but the alternative is a term that does not exist in the passage. Any suggestions? Thanks! What a wonderful video this is!!

These videos are sooo helpful its crazy how much information I've retained due to the humor and simplicity of the information provided!

2024 and this video was still very helpful! Made learning the steps enjoyable as well, considering I've been dreading studying RC.

this series is gold. thank you so much

Anyone else here for the MCAT 👀👀

I got one wrong but that’s cuss my reading comp sucks but I mean I just need more practice lol

Hi! Just a quick question. Is main conclusion the same as main point?

THANK U SO MUCH FOR THIS VIDEO!!!!

Many thanks for this video

Extremely great video!

Everyone is so hyped up about the power score books. What they should be hyped up about are these free courses that teach more about logical reasoning than any book.

One question, when I was doing the last passage of this video, I put New Vs. Old as my framework. Why would this framework be considered incorrect? Thank you. Great video by the way.

8:01

For #5, "Unless you apologize, I'm going to quit the game" I initially answered: - If quit --> NO Apology - If Apology --> NO quit I see how the first one doesn't work, because the person could still quit in another situation, therefore "No Apology" is not REQUIRED for quitting. But the contrapositive, which translates to, "If you apologize then I don't quit," is something I'm snagging on. Is it because not quitting is not necessary for an apology? Thank you!

could number 8 also be written as: - If BS and NOT M --> Cool - If NOT Cool --> NOT BS or M or is it better if breath strips and mints are kept as a single entity in the exercise?

I’m not even taking the LSAT but this video has been so helpful for me improving in CARS for the MCAT

Thank you for discussing the heuristics you use to tackle these kinds of questions. These questions I find easily the most time-consuming in LR. Every shortcut is helpful!

My favorite lsat videos are LSAT Lab videos and I've paid for courses.. Patrick you are heaven sent. Thank you.

Did I just get called a sugar booger?

If ANC A read " If politicians were less isolated from their electorate then there is a chance that any particular acts of resident participation will elicit a positive response" ; then would it be an ANC supported by the given facts?

Thank you sm it's just amazing way

12:54, got tricked by D. With all due respect, the 2nd sentence can absolutely be said to form a hypothesis. Saying “This indicates that X depends on Y;” while referring to premises made in an argument falls under the category of “presenting a hypothesis.” What threw me off is the health aspect. It seems as though the hypothesis says “Therefore, the better off/more successful/healthier everything else is, the healthier/heavier the newborn.” If common knowledge were to play a role here, his would make it more specific than A! However, the stimulus never establishes attributes lush food to a healthy ecosystem, nor does it link heaviness in a baby to its overall heath. The 2 are completely independent phenomena of each other.

18:27 v well explained!

It is visible in the rules that k can not be 5 it has h and j after itself and the films are six.

This video is a great study aid for the LSAT.

Using this to study for the MCAT😭😂

14:30 how they both can be out ?

2007, S2, Q6: answer choice A is not a negation. Question stem gives us executive board -> undergraduate + no felony. This is because felony -> no board, so the contrapositive combined with the first condition gives us that. Option A specialises this condition to board -> masters + no felony. This is because eligibility conditions are necessary conditions. Ie it’s not no felony -> board as shown in the visual but rather board -> no felony. Eligibility does not imply board membership. It simply means this condition must be present for the board members. Of course it could also be that there are multiple alternative eligibility criteria in which case it is not even a necessary condition but regardless it’s not a sufficient condition, and so not a negation.

(1) K or L -> M. (2) NOT K -> L. Taking the contra positive of 1, NOT M -> NOT K AND NOT L. But NOT K -> L (as given in 2). Contradiction in the setup?

Question #2 did not make sense to me at all.

Assumption with evidence, function and inference👍

The only thing left is repitition

Thank you so much

This entire playlist during test week and gave me so much relative information for test. I feel even more confident in my approach for the test day! These videos are amazing and very informative. THANK YOU!!!!

Thank you so much for this. It cleared up so many things!

Great job.

I can not say enough how helpful you guys at LSAT Lab have been for my studying for the LSAT! Genuinely great videos all around. Thank you guys so much!

Where does he explain that B is wrong?

The best!

very good! Clearly stated the point of each question

I am wholeheartedly depending on you to save my LSAT score

Very useful and entertaining video! You know you found something awesome when you walk away laughing and more prepared to take on LSAT RC

THIS VIDEO IS SO UNDERRATED!!! This is the best video that I have ever seen for reading comprehension. I am studying for MCAT and CARS is killing me but this video is literally gold and I am so happy that I found this before my exam. Thank you so much!!!!!!